Motiva vs Mentor Breast Implants in Korea
A clinical comparison of Motiva and Mentor breast implants used in Korea — surface technology, gel cohesivity, profile options, and regulatory status. Reviewed by Dr. Kim Uigeon at UNE Plastic Surgery, a breast-focused plastic surgery clinic in Gangnam, Seoul.
How Are Motiva and Mentor Different?
Dr. Kim Uigeon of UNE Plastic Surgery, a board-certified plastic surgeon practising at a breast-focused plastic surgery clinic in Gangnam, Seoul, Korea, explains that Motiva (Establishment Labs) and Mentor (Johnson & Johnson) differ in surface technology, gel cohesivity, profile options, and regulatory clearance history. Motiva uses a SmoothSilk / SilkSurface nano-textured surface and ProgressiveGel Ultima cohesive silicone (Ergonomix, Round lines). Mentor uses MemoryGel cohesive silicone (MemoryGel, Xtra, CPG lines). Implant brand alone does not determine the surgical outcome; selection should be individualized to chest anatomy and patient goals.
Quick Answers
What is the key surface difference between Motiva and Mentor?
Motiva uses a SmoothSilk / SilkSurface nano-textured shell with surface roughness measured in micrometers — categorized as smooth-surface under recent FDA guidance. Mentor offers smooth-surface (MemoryGel) and previously-textured options; current Korean and US markets primarily use smooth-surface Mentor MemoryGel and Xtra lines.
How does the gel inside each implant differ?
Motiva uses ProgressiveGel Ultima, a cohesive silicone gel designed to shift shape based on body position (more teardrop-like when upright, more rounded when supine). Mentor MemoryGel and Xtra use cohesive silicone gel engineered to retain shape while feeling natural to touch. Subjective feel depends on tissue coverage as well as gel properties.
Are both brands FDA-approved?
Mentor MemoryGel has long-standing US FDA approval. Motiva received US FDA approval in 2024 (Motiva Implant Matrix Ergonomix and Round, SmoothSilk / SilkSurface). Both brands hold Korean MFDS clearance and CE marking.
Which brand is better for me?
There is no universally better brand. Implant selection should be based on chest width, breast base width, skin thickness, tissue coverage, body proportions, desired contour, and revision considerations — not brand alone. The choice is made during in-person consultation.
Brand Overview
Motiva (Establishment Labs)
Motiva is a breast implant brand manufactured by Establishment Labs, based in Costa Rica. Motiva implants are designed around the SmoothSilk / SilkSurface nano-textured shell and the ProgressiveGel Ultima cohesive silicone gel.
- Common lines
- Ergonomix (gravity-responsive), Round, Mini, Demi.
- Surface
- SmoothSilk / SilkSurface nano-textured (categorized as smooth-surface).
- Gel
- ProgressiveGel Ultima — cohesive, gravity-responsive.
- Regulatory
- US FDA approval (2024, Ergonomix and Round); Korean MFDS; CE marking.
Mentor (Johnson & Johnson)
Mentor is a breast implant brand owned by Mentor Worldwide LLC, a Johnson & Johnson MedTech company. Mentor implants are widely used in the US and Korean markets and have decades of clinical follow-up data.
- Common lines
- MemoryGel (standard cohesive), Xtra (high-cohesive, higher volume), CPG (shaped / anatomical).
- Surface
- Smooth (MemoryGel, Xtra); previously-available textured (Siltex / CPG) — current Korean market favors smooth.
- Gel
- MemoryGel cohesive silicone (standard and higher-cohesive Xtra variant).
- Regulatory
- Long-standing US FDA approval; Korean MFDS; CE marking.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Property | Motiva (Ergonomix / Round) | Mentor (MemoryGel / Xtra) |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Establishment Labs (Costa Rica) | Mentor Worldwide LLC (Johnson & Johnson) |
| Surface technology | SmoothSilk / SilkSurface nano-textured | Smooth (MemoryGel, Xtra) |
| Gel | ProgressiveGel Ultima (gravity-responsive cohesive) | MemoryGel cohesive (Xtra = higher cohesivity) |
| Shape behaviour | Round shell with gel that shifts toward teardrop when upright | Round shell, shape-retentive gel |
| Profile options | Mini, Demi, Full, Corse (varies by line) | Moderate, Moderate Plus, High; Xtra adds higher projection |
| US FDA status | Approved 2024 (Ergonomix & Round, SmoothSilk / SilkSurface) | Long-standing approval (MemoryGel since 2006) |
| Common use in revision | Often used in revision when smooth-surface preferred | Long clinical track record in revision and primary |
Note: this table summarizes generally available product information at the time of publication. Specific product availability, generations, and regulatory status should be verified during consultation.
How Implant Brand and Profile Are Selected
At UNE Plastic Surgery, breast implant brand and profile selection follows an individualized clinical assessment rather than a brand-first approach. The factors evaluated during in-person consultation include:
- Chest width and breast base width — determines compatible implant base widths.
- Skin thickness and tissue coverage — affects implant edge visibility and surface choice.
- Body proportions and existing breast shape — informs profile (Low / Moderate / High / Corse) and volume.
- Desired upper-pole fullness and overall contour — guides shape selection.
- Revision history — capsule status, previous implant brand and generation, and pocket geometry influence selection.
- Patient priorities — feel, recovery considerations, and personal preferences.
Implant brand alone should not determine the surgical plan. The choice between Motiva and Mentor — and between specific lines within each brand — is made case-by-case after in-person consultation.
Motiva and Mentor in Breast Revision Surgery
In breast revision (e.g., capsular contracture correction, implant exchange, malposition repair), implant selection becomes more individualized because the surgical context includes the existing capsule, prior pocket geometry, and tissue thinning. Both Motiva and Mentor are used in Korean revision practice. Common considerations include:
- Whether the new implant surface should differ from the original (e.g., switch from textured to smooth-surface in cases of BIA-ALCL concern or capsular contracture history).
- Whether the new implant size and profile match the planned pocket conversion (e.g., dual plane).
- Whether tissue coverage is sufficient for the selected implant — possibly favoring a thinner-edge or specific gel cohesivity.
- Patient preferences regarding feel, shape behaviour, and clinical considerations.
Capsular contracture, implant rupture, and other revision indications are evaluated together with implant brand selection. See the related pages for detailed revision-topic content.
Considering Breast Augmentation or Revision in Korea?
Dr. Kim Uigeon, a board-certified plastic surgeon at UNE Plastic Surgery in Gangnam, Seoul, reviews chest anatomy, tissue condition, and individual goals during in-person consultation before recommending implant brand and profile.
Book Consultation
