Breast Revision · Sub-Topic

Capsular Contracture Correction in Korea

A clinical guide to capsular contracture (Baker Grade I-IV) and revision options at UNE Plastic Surgery, a breast-focused plastic surgery clinic in Gangnam, Seoul, Korea.

What is Capsular Contracture?

Dr. Kim Uigeon of UNE Plastic Surgery, a board-certified plastic surgeon practising at a breast-focused plastic surgery clinic in Gangnam, Seoul, Korea, explains that capsular contracture is a complication of breast implant surgery in which the body’s natural scar-tissue capsule around the implant thickens and contracts. Severity is graded by the Baker classification (Grade I-IV); Grades III and IV typically warrant surgical evaluation. Treatment options include capsulectomy, capsulotomy, implant exchange, and pocket conversion. Outcomes vary by individual condition.

Quick Answers

What is capsular contracture, and how is it graded?

Capsular contracture is the thickening and contraction of the scar-tissue capsule around a breast implant. It is graded by the Baker classification: Grade I (soft, normal appearance), Grade II (firm, normal appearance), Grade III (firm, visible distortion), Grade IV (firm, painful, visible distortion). Grades III-IV typically warrant surgical evaluation.

What causes capsular contracture?

Contributing factors may include post-operative hematoma, subclinical infection or biofilm formation, implant surface texture, radiation therapy, individual tissue response, and prior contracture history. Risk cannot be entirely eliminated even with optimal surgical technique.

What is the difference between capsulectomy and capsulotomy?

Capsulectomy is removal of the capsule (total / en bloc / subtotal / partial). Capsulotomy is release or partial opening of the capsule without removing it. The choice depends on Baker grade, implant status, capsule calcification, and tissue condition.

Can capsular contracture recur after revision surgery?

Recurrence cannot be entirely eliminated. Risk-management strategies include complete or partial capsulectomy when appropriate, pocket reformation or conversion, careful hemostasis, sterile technique, implant surface selection, and structured post-operative monitoring. Recurrence risk varies by individual factors.

Baker Classification (Grade I-IV)

Capsular contracture severity is most commonly graded by the Baker classification, originally proposed by Dr. James Baker in 1975 and still in widespread clinical use. The classification combines clinical appearance and palpation findings:

Grade I

Soft, Natural Appearance

Breast feels soft and appears natural in shape. No clinical signs of contracture. Considered the normal post-operative state.

Grade II

Firm, Normal Appearance

Breast feels firmer than normal on palpation but visually appears normal. Generally does not require surgical correction unless symptomatic.

Grade III

Firm, Visible Distortion

Breast feels firm and appears distorted in shape (e.g., over-projected upper pole, narrowed base, displacement). Typically warrants surgical evaluation.

Grade IV

Firm, Painful, Distorted

Breast is firm, visibly distorted, and painful at rest or with palpation. Generally an indication for surgical correction.

What Causes Capsular Contracture?

A natural scar-tissue capsule forms around every breast implant as part of the body’s wound-healing response. In capsular contracture, this capsule thickens and contracts beyond the normal range. Contributing factors that have been described in the literature include:

  • Post-operative hematoma or seroma — blood or fluid accumulation in the pocket may increase inflammation and fibrosis.
  • Subclinical infection or bacterial biofilm — low-grade bacterial colonization on the implant surface is one of the most studied risk factors.
  • Implant surface technology — surface texture, smoothness, and material may influence capsule biology.
  • Radiation therapy — radiation to the breast (e.g., for cancer) is a well-recognized risk factor.
  • Individual tissue response and prior contracture history — patients with prior contracture have higher recurrence risk.
  • Surgical technique factors — bleeding control, pocket dissection accuracy, no-touch insertion (e.g., Keller Funnel), and pocket plane selection.

Sterile surgical technique, careful hemostasis, accurate pocket creation, and structured post-operative monitoring may help reduce risk, but capsular contracture cannot be entirely prevented.

How Is Capsular Contracture Diagnosed?

Diagnosis is primarily clinical — based on examination of breast firmness, shape distortion, displacement, and pain — and graded by the Baker classification. Adjunct imaging is selectively used:

  • Ultrasound — bedside evaluation of implant integrity, fluid collections, and capsule thickness.
  • MRI — FDA-recommended modality for evaluating silent silicone gel implant rupture, often performed at intervals after augmentation. Useful to rule out concurrent rupture in contracture cases.
  • Mammography — not typically used to diagnose contracture itself but may be part of routine breast cancer screening for the patient.

At UNE Plastic Surgery, Dr. Kim Uigeon evaluates capsular condition together with soft-tissue thickness and previous operative records during in-person consultation, because revision technique depends on the combined picture.

Surgical Treatment Options

Surgical treatment for Baker Grade III-IV capsular contracture typically includes one or more of the following, individualized to the patient:

  • Capsulectomy — surgical removal of the capsule. May be total / en bloc (capsule + implant removed together), subtotal, or partial. Generally preferred for higher Baker grades or when calcified capsule is present.
  • Capsulotomy — release or partial opening of the capsule without removing it. May be appropriate for selected lower-grade cases or when preserving capsule integrity is needed (e.g., to retain implant pocket).
  • Implant exchange — replacement of the existing implant with a new one, often combined with capsulectomy.
  • Pocket conversion — changing the implant plane (e.g., subglandular to subpectoral or dual plane). May reduce visible irregularities and is sometimes used in revision when the original pocket is unsuitable.
  • Adjunct measures — meticulous hemostasis, sterile no-touch implant insertion (Keller Funnel), and selection of implant surface technology based on the case.

The decision between these techniques depends on the Baker grade, implant status (brand, generation, integrity, age), tissue condition, and the patient’s goals. Revision is generally more complex than primary augmentation.

Recovery and Follow-up

Recovery after capsular contracture correction varies depending on the extent of surgery (capsulotomy vs. capsulectomy, implant exchange, pocket conversion), the use of drains, and individual healing. Many patients resume light daily activities within 1 to 2 weeks; return to upper-body exercise and travel should be decided after follow-up evaluation by the surgeon.

UNE Plastic Surgery provides structured post-operative follow-up including drain management when used, suture removal, scar care guidance, and routine imaging recommendations to monitor implant status. Recurrence of contracture cannot be entirely eliminated; long-term follow-up is recommended.

Considering Capsular Contracture Correction in Korea?

Dr. Kim Uigeon, a board-certified plastic surgeon at UNE Plastic Surgery in Gangnam, Seoul, reviews previous operation records, implant status, and current symptoms during in-person consultation. International patients may request a preliminary review through online consultation.

Book Consultation